切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华针灸电子杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (02) : 58 -65. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3240.2025.02.004

文献研究

不同针灸疗法治疗乳腺癌术后淋巴水肿相关症状的Meta 分析及其腧穴配伍的网状Meta 分析
黑墨然1, 马慧娥1, 郝嫣然1, 徐泽成1, 郭义2,3, 陈泽林1,2, 李丹1,2, 陈波1,2, 赵雪1,2, 赵天易2,3,4,   
  1. 1. 301617 天津中医药大学针灸推拿学院
    2. 301617 天津中医药大学中医药标准化研究所
    3. 301617 天津市现代中医理论创新转化重点实验室
    4. 301617 天津中医药大学中医学院
  • 收稿日期:2024-10-01 出版日期:2025-05-15
  • 通信作者: 赵天易
  • 基金资助:
    天津市卫生健康委员会中医中西结合科研课题(2023147)

Meta-analysis of different acupuncture therapies for lymphedema-related symptoms after breast cancer surgery and network Meta-analysis of acupoint selection strategies

Moran Hei1, Hui′e Ma1, Yanran Hao1, Zecheng Xu1, Yi Guo2,3, Zelin Chen1,2, Dan Li1,2, Bo Chen1,2, Xue Zhao1,2, Tianyi Zhao2,3,4,   

  1. 1. School of Acupuncture-Moxibustion and Tuina,Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Tianjin 301617,China
    2. Institute of Traditional Chinese Medicine Standardization,Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Tianjin 301617,China
    3. Tianjin Key Laboratory for Innovation and Transformation of Modern Traditional Chinese Medicine Theory,Tianjin 301617,China
    4. School of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Tianjin 301617,China
  • Received:2024-10-01 Published:2025-05-15
  • Corresponding author: Tianyi Zhao
引用本文:

黑墨然, 马慧娥, 郝嫣然, 徐泽成, 郭义, 陈泽林, 李丹, 陈波, 赵雪, 赵天易. 不同针灸疗法治疗乳腺癌术后淋巴水肿相关症状的Meta 分析及其腧穴配伍的网状Meta 分析[J/OL]. 中华针灸电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 58-65.

Moran Hei, Hui′e Ma, Yanran Hao, Zecheng Xu, Yi Guo, Zelin Chen, Dan Li, Bo Chen, Xue Zhao, Tianyi Zhao. Meta-analysis of different acupuncture therapies for lymphedema-related symptoms after breast cancer surgery and network Meta-analysis of acupoint selection strategies[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Acupuncture and Moxibustion(Electronic Edition), 2025, 14(02): 58-65.

目的

采用两两比较Meta 分析和网状Meta 分析相结合的方法,对不同针灸疗法治疗乳腺癌术后上肢淋巴水肿(BCRL)的疗效和腧穴配伍优效性进行评价。

方法

计算机检索中国期刊全文数据库(CNKI)、万方数据知识服务平台(Wanfang)、维普中文科技期刊数据库(VIP)、中国临床试验注册中心(ChiCTR)、 Web of Science、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL)、EMbase、PubMed、Mednar 数据库中针灸疗法治疗BCRL 相关症状的随机对照试验(RCT)文献,检索时限为建库至2024年5月31 日。 由2 位评价员独立筛选文献、提取资料及评价纳入研究的偏倚风险后,运用RevMan 5.3 和Stata 15.0 软件对数据进行分析。

结果

共检索文献1624 篇,最终9 篇RCT 被纳入分析,总样本量为452 例。 Meta 分析显示,手针组与对照组在改善患肢肘上10 cm 处臂围方面比较,差异无统计学意义[MD=-1.3,95%CI(-2.71,0.10),P=0.07];温针灸组和力动针组与空白对照组在改善患健肢腕横纹处臂围差方面比较,差异无统计学意义[MD =-0.13,95%CI(0.37,0.11),P =0.09];温针灸组与空白对照组在减轻患健肢腕横纹和腕横纹上5 cm 处围度差方面比较,差异无统计学意义[MD=0.07,95%CI(-0.29,0.43),P=0.35];温针灸在改善BCRL 的淋巴水肿有效指数方面,其效果显著优于地奥司明片[MD=27.63,95%CI(24.73,30.52),P<0.001]。 网状Meta 分析结果显示,在治疗BCRL 方面,不同配穴方式同空白对照和药物治疗之间累积排序曲线下面积排序:远近配穴(83.3%)>等待治疗(66.9%)>药物治疗(48.8%)>局部配穴(1.0%)。

结论

温针灸能够改善BCRL 整体症状,且推荐远近配穴的取穴方案。 但由于纳入文献量较少且质量不一,仍需要更多高质量RCT 进一步证实。

Objective

This study combines pairwise Meta-analysis and network Meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of different acupuncture therapies in treating postoperative upper limb lymphedema(BCRL) after breast cancer surgery and to assess the optimal acupoint selection strategies.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases,including CNKI,Wanfang,VIP,ChiCTR,Web of Science,Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL),Embase,PubMed,and Mednar,covering studies published up to May 31,2024. Randomized controlled trials(RCTs) investigating acupuncture interventions for BCRL were included. Two independent reviewers screened the literature,extracted data,and assessed the risk of bias. Data analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 and Stata 15.0.

Results

A total of 1624 articles were identified and 9 RCTs with a combined sample size of 452 participants were included.Meta-analysis revealed that manual acupuncture alone showed no significant difference in reducing arm circumference of the affected limb at the upper 10 cm of the elbow when compared with the control group [MD=-1.3,95% CI (-2.71,0.10), P=0.07]. Similarly,no significant difference was observed in wrist circumference reduction between the warm acupuncture or force-dynamic acupuncture groups and the blank control group [MD =-0.13,95% CI (0.37,0.11), P =0.09]. Furthermore,warm acupuncture did not demonstrate a statistically significant reduction in the difference between wrist circumference and the circumference 5 cm above the wrist compared to the blank control group [MD=0.07,95% CI (-0.29,0.43),P=0.35]. However,warm acupuncture showed a significant advantage over diosmin tablets in improving the lymphatic edema index [MD =27.63,95% CI (24.73,30.52), P<0.001]. Network Meta-analysis results indicated that among different acupoint selection strategies,distal-proximal acupoint combination exhibited the highest cumulative probability of effectiveness (83.3%),followed by waiting treatment (66.9%),drug therapy(48.8%),and local acupoint selection (1.0%).

Conclusion

Warm acupuncture is effective in alleviating BCRL symptoms,and the distal-proximal acupoint combination is recommended as the preferred acupoint selection strategy. However,due to the limited number and variable quality of the included literature,further high-quality RCTs are needed to confirm these findings.

图1 文献筛选流程图
表1 针灸疗法治疗乳腺癌术后淋巴水肿相关症状随机对照试验文献基本特征
图2 纳入文献偏倚风险图
图3 纳入文献偏倚风险总结图
图4 针刺组与对照组治疗乳腺癌术后上肢淋巴水肿随机对照试验文献患肢肘上10 cm 处臂围比较
图5 温针灸组与力动针组治疗乳腺癌术后上肢淋巴水肿随机对照试验文献患健肢腕横纹处围度差比较
图6 温针灸组与空白对照组治疗乳腺癌术后上肢淋巴水肿随机对照试验文献患肢腕横纹处和腕横纹上5 cm 处围度差比较
图7 温针灸组与地奥司明片组治疗乳腺癌术后上肢淋巴水肿随机对照试验文献水肿有效指数比较
图8 不同配穴方案对乳腺癌术后上肢淋巴水肿患肢臂围影响的网状关系图 注:Diuretics 为利尿剂组;Local distribution TA为局部配穴组;Distal-proximal TA 为远近配穴组;WL 为等待治疗组
图9 不同配穴方案对乳腺癌术后上肢淋巴水肿患肢臂围改善的排序预测图 注:Diuretics 为利尿剂组;Local distribution TA 为局部配穴组;Distal-proximal TA为远近配穴组;WL 为等待治疗组;Estimated Probabilities 为估计概率;Predictive Probabiliites 为预测概率;cumulative probabilities 为累积概率;SUCRA 为累积排序曲线下面积
1
Wong HCY,Wallen MP,Chan AW,et al. Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer(MASCC) clinical practice guidance for the prevention of breast cancer-related arm lymphoedema (BCRAL): international Delphi consensus-based recommendations[J]. EClinicalMedicine,2024,68: 102441.
2
中华医学会整形外科学分会淋巴水肿治疗学组.乳腺癌术后上肢淋巴水肿诊治指南与规范(2021年版)[J]. 组织工程与重建外科,2021,17(6): 457-461.
3
Greenlee H,DuPont-Reyes MJ,Balneaves LG,et al. Clinical practice guidelines on the evidence-based use of integrative therapies during and after breast cancer treatment[J]. CA Cancer J Clin,2017,67(3): 194-232.
4
刘文浩,刘文婷,黄乐天,等. 针灸辅助肿瘤化疗的热点及趋势:基于CiteSpace 和VOSviewer 的文献计量分析[J/OL]. 中国针灸,1-15[2024-11-06]. https:/ /doi.org/10.13703/j.0255-2930.20231229-k0005.
5
Jin H,Xiang Y,Feng Y,et al. Effectiveness and Safety of Acupuncture Moxibustion Therapy Used in Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis[J]. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med,2020,2020: 3237451.
6
刘兆喆,李秋华,李文雅,等. 乳腺癌术后淋巴水肿中西医结合诊治中国专家共识[J]. 创伤与急危重病医学,2023,11(1):1-8.
7
Harris RJ,Deeks JJ,Altman DG,et al. Metan: fixed- and randomeffects meta-analysis[J]. The Stata Journal,2008,8(1): 3-28.
8
张天嵩. 高级Meta 分析方法: 基于Stata 实现[M]. 上海:复旦大学出版社,2015.
9
田金徽,李伦,赵晔,等. 网状Meta 分析的撰写与报告[J]. 中国药物评价,2013,30(6): 321-323,333.
10
张超,陶华,李胜,等. 应用Stata 软件mvmeta 程序包实现网状Meta 分析[J]. 中国循证医学杂志,2014,14(9): 1150-1159.
11
Smith CA,Pirotta M,Kilbreath S. A feasibility study to examine the role of acupuncture to reduce symptoms of lymphoedema after breast cancer: a randomised controlled trial[J]. Acupunct Med,2014,32(5): 387-393.
12
陈军,裴春勤,邬晓敏,等. 针刺疗法治疗乳腺癌术后上肢水肿28 例[J]. 浙江中医杂志,2016,51(12): 905.
13
Yao C,Xu Y,Chen L,et al. Effects of warm acupuncture on breast cancer-related chronic lymphedema:a randomized controlled trial[J].Curr Oncol,2016,23(1): e27-e34.
14
Bao T,Iris Zhi W,Vertosick EA,et al. Acupuncture for breast cancer-related lymphedema: a randomized controlled trial [J].Breast Cancer Res Treat,2018,170(1): 77-87.
15
韩玉静. 温针灸改善乳腺癌术后上肢淋巴水肿的疗效观察及机制初探[D]. 天津: 天津中医药大学,2020.
16
赵薇,张宏如,陆萍,等. 力动针结合功能锻炼治疗乳腺癌术后上肢淋巴水肿:随机对照试验[J]. 中国针灸,2023,43(10):1123-1127.
17
Friedman R,Johnson AR,Shillue K,et al. Acupuncture treatment for breast cancer-related lymphedema: a randomized pilot study[J].Lymphat Res Biol,2023,21(5): 488-494.
18
杨水仙. 温针灸干预乳腺癌术后上肢淋巴水肿疗效及安全性的多中心随机对照试验研究[D]. 天津: 天津中医药大学,2023.
19
刘晓芳,张鑫,孔晶. 温针灸对乳腺癌患者术后上肢水肿的疗效及焦虑抑郁的观察研究[J]. 世界中医药,2019,14(7):1856-1860.
20
杨晓冬,金维捷,黄敏. 乳腺癌术后上肢淋巴水肿的中医治疗研究进展[J]. 云南中医中药杂志,2024,5(10): 92-95.
21
胡军. 中医外治治疗乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿(BCRL)的网状Meta分析[D]. 南宁: 广西中医药大学,2023.
22
何芸,范焕芳,马盼,等. 不同针灸治疗方式干预乳腺癌术后上肢淋巴水肿效果的网状Meta 分析[J/OL]. 中国全科医学,1-8[2024-11-06]. http:/ /kns. cnki. net/kcms/detail/13. 1222. R.20240828.1839.017.html.
23
李博,陈波,陈泽林,等. 《现代针灸病谱》穴位配伍规律初探[J].北京中医药大学学报,2016,39(4): 350-352.
24
崔鑫. 不同腧穴配伍温针灸治疗大鼠前肢继发性淋巴水肿机制的初步研究[D]. 天津: 天津中医药大学,2023.
25
郝羚伦,彭梦薇,张艳,等. 针刺治疗肿瘤并发症的临床研究进展[J]. 中华中医药学刊,2024,42(9): 74-78.
[1] 张秋阳, 余韶芸, 潘向滢, 金家佳, 夏桦, 赵雪红. 成年体外膜肺氧合患者出血影响因素的Meta 分析[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 392-398.
[2] 吴义刚, 潘裕民, 吴姗姗, 胡梦涓, 王一为, 张劲松, 乔莉. 左西孟旦治疗肺动脉高压合并右心衰竭患者疗效分析——Meta 分析[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 385-391.
[3] 周松, 蒋湘勇, 康海, 杨科, 危安, 唐振华, 李铁求. 超声造影诊断前列腺癌的应用价值:一项荟萃分析[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 159-166.
[4] 李鑫, 李乐, 陈金明, 刘蕊. 基于Meta 分析构建肝癌微血管侵犯的术前预测模型[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 74-80.
[5] 董思帆, 安仕琪, 刘起帆, 王楚风, 蒋安. 光动力疗法在晚期胆管癌姑息性治疗中的安全性和疗效Meta 分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 68-73.
[6] 任航军, 孙毅, 敖小青, 申燕, 张佳敏, 陆森. 内扎外剥缝合术与外剥内扎术治疗混合痔疗效及安全性的Meta 分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 71-82.
[7] 梁轩豪, 李小荣, 李亮, 林昌伟. 肠梗阻支架置入术联合新辅助化疗治疗结直肠癌急性肠梗阻的疗效及其预后的Meta 分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 472-482.
[8] 王利航, 孙官文, 包呼和, 倪熙宇, 张万印, 黄斐, 杨鹏波. 三种手术方式治疗肩锁关节脱位疗效的网状Meta 分析[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 332-343.
[9] 符文彬, 宁百乐, 吴倩, 王聪, 马瑞, 罗丁, 周俊合, 梁雪松, 王舢泽. 针灸临床特色技术的应用与发展[J/OL]. 中华针灸电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 1-6.
[10] 符文彬. 岭南疏肝调神针灸技术[J/OL]. 中华针灸电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 177-177.
[11] 李家山, 郭义, 杨卓欣, 黄杏贤, 李紫岩, 赵天易, 何丽云. 针灸干预乳腺癌辅助激素疗法后血管舒缩症状的病例注册登记设计探讨[J/OL]. 中华针灸电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 171-176.
[12] 王超, 许耘箔, 许书嘉, 黄杏贤. 世界针灸学会联合会针灸国际标准建设的概况与思考[J/OL]. 中华针灸电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 149-152.
[13] 赵楠琦, 武晓冬, 牟东晓, 丁楠, 胡静. 基于针灸临床实践指南制定的古代医家经验作用价值分析[J/OL]. 中华针灸电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 140-144.
[14] 郭义, 陈泽林, 赵雪, 杨毅, 徐泽成. 中医针灸标准化基本理论和方法的探索与实践[J/OL]. 中华针灸电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 133-139.
[15] 董宝强. 针灸推拿治疗运动损伤病症的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华针灸电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 117-119.
阅读次数
全文


摘要