切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华针灸电子杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (01) : 5 -9. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3240.2021.01.002

所属专题: 文献

论著

温针疗法对肩关节镜术后镇痛消肿的疗效观察
楚晓丰1,(), 范小艺1, 姜丽1, 梁宁1, 刘春玲1   
  1. 1. 264200 山东省威海卫人民医院骨科
  • 收稿日期:2012-02-27 出版日期:2021-02-15
  • 通信作者: 楚晓丰
  • 基金资助:
    山东省中医药管理局科研项目(2019-0785)

Clinical study on analgesic and detumescent effect of warm acupuncture on patients after shoulder arthroscopy

Xiaofeng Chu1,(), Xiaoyi Fan1, Li Jiang1, Ning Liang1, Chunling Liu1   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopaedics, Weihaiwei People′s Hospital, Weihai 264200, China
  • Received:2012-02-27 Published:2021-02-15
  • Corresponding author: Xiaofeng Chu
引用本文:

楚晓丰, 范小艺, 姜丽, 梁宁, 刘春玲. 温针疗法对肩关节镜术后镇痛消肿的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华针灸电子杂志, 2021, 10(01): 5-9.

Xiaofeng Chu, Xiaoyi Fan, Li Jiang, Ning Liang, Chunling Liu. Clinical study on analgesic and detumescent effect of warm acupuncture on patients after shoulder arthroscopy[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Acupuncture and Moxibustion(Electronic Edition), 2021, 10(01): 5-9.

目的

探讨温针治疗对肩关节镜术后患者镇痛消肿临床疗效。

方法

将2019年6月至2020年3月于山东省威海卫人民医院骨科行肩关节镜手术的80例患者,按照随机数字表法随机分为对照组和试验组,每组40例。对照组采用常规肩关节镜治疗,试验组采用常规肩关节镜治疗,术后予以温针治疗。2组术前与术后不同时间的疼痛、肿胀情况比较采用单因素重复测量资料的方差分析,不同时段两组间比较采用LSD-t法检验。

结果

(1)视觉模拟评分(VAS)比较。对照组和试验组治疗后各时段VAS评分均较2组术前降低(F=2.58、8.42,P均<0.05);2组治疗后各时段比较:试验组术后后各时段VAS评分与对照组比较,差异有统计学意义(F=1.715,P<0.05),进一步两两比较,试验组术后24 h、48 h、72 h的VAS评分较对照组降低,且差异有统计学意义(t=1.726、1.897、2.526,P均<0.05)。(2)2组患者肘关节外上髁上15 cm处周径变化比较。对照组和试验组术后各时段肘关节外上髁上15 cm周径均较2组术前增大(F=13.25、198.30,P均<0.05),随着术后时间增加周径逐渐变小;2组治疗后各时段比较:试验组术后各时段肘关节外上髁上15 cm处周径与对照组比较差异有统计学意义(F=1.824,P<0.05),进一步两两比较,试验组术后24 h、48 h、72 h肘关节外上髁上15 cm处周径较对照组减小,且差异有统计学意义(t=1.598、1.635、1.825,P均<0.05)。(3)2组患者腋窝处周径变化比较。2组术后各时段腋窝处周径均较2组术前明显增大(F=2.25、212.30,P均<0.05);2组治疗后各时段比较:试验组术后各时段腋窝处周径与对照组比较差异有统计学意义(F=1.617,P<0.05),进一步两两比较,试验组术后24 h、48 h、72 h腋窝处周径较对照组减小,且差异均有统计学意义(t=1.617、1.826、1.659,P均<0.05)。

结论

温针疗法可以有效减轻肩关节镜术后的肿胀、疼痛,值得临床推广。

Objective

To investigate the analgesic and detumescent effect of warm acupuncture on patients after shoulder arthroscopy.

Methods

A total of 80 patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopy in the Department of Orthopedics, Weihaiwei People′s Hospital of Shandong Province from June 2019 to March 2020 were randomly divided into a control group and an experimental group according to the random number table method, with 40 patients in each group. The control group was treated with conventional shoulder arthroscopy, while the experimental group was treated with conventional shoulder arthroscopy and postoperative warm acupuncture. The comparison of pain and swelling between the two groups at different times before and after operation was performed by one way ANOVA with single factor repeated measurement data, and the comparison between the two groups at different times was performed by LSD-t method.

Results

(1)Comparison of VAS scores. VAS scores in the control group and the experimental group in each period after treatment were all lower than those in the two groups before treatment (F=2.58, 8.42, all P<0.05). Comparison of each period after treatment between the two groups: the VAS scores of the experimental group and the control group in each period after surgery showed statistically significant differences (F=1.715, P<0.05). Further pin-two comparison showed that the VAS scores of the experimental group at 24 h, 48 h and 72 h after surgery were lower than those of the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (t=1.726, 1.897 and 2.526, all P<0.05). (2)Comparison of circumference at 15 cm of the external epicondyle of elbow joint between 2 groups. The circumference of 15 cm on the external epicondyle of the elbow in the control group and the experimental group in all operation periods increased compared with that before operation in the 2 groups (F=13.25, 198.30, all P<0.05), and the circumference gradually decreased with the increase of postoperative time. And two groups after treatment were compared: the difference between two groups in each period was statistically significant (F=1.824, P<0.05), further comparison showed thatthe circumference of the experimental group after 24 h, 48 h, 72 h group was reduced compared with that of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (t=1.598, 1.635, 1.825, all P<0.05). (3)Comparison of axillary circumference between 2 groups. The axillary circumference in each period after operation in both groups was significantly larger than that before operation in both groups (F=2.25, 212.30, all P<0.05). And two groups after treatment were compared: the difference in the circumference of the experimental group in each period after treatment was statistically significant compared with the control group(F=1.617, P<0.05), further comparison showed that the circumference of the experimental group after 24 h, 48 h, 72 h was reduced, and the difference was statistically significant (t=1.617, 1.826, 1.659, all P<0.05).

Conclusion

Warm needle therapy can effectively reduce the swelling and pain after shoulder arthroscopy, which is worthy of clinical promotion.

表1 2组患者手术前后肩关节VAS评分比较(分,±s)
表2 2组患者手术前后肘关节外上髁上15 cm周径比较(cm,±s)
表3 2组患者手术前后腋窝处周径比较(cm,±s)
1
边文超,张磊,李进选,等.肩关节镜围手术期镇痛新进展[J].中国骨伤,2015,28(1): 85-89.
2
[美]阿扎(Azar). 坎贝尔骨科手术学[M].唐佩福,王岩,卢世璧. 北京:北京大学医学出版社,2018.
3
夏永宁,侯海琴,赵毅,等.急性肩锁关节脱位诊断与治疗的现状[J].中国老年学杂志,2018,38(24): 6121-6123.
4
李良军,丑克,何志勇,等.肩关节镜下治疗巨大肩袖撕裂的疗效观察[J].中国内镜杂志,2015, 21(10): 1077-1081.
5
Ruiz-Suarez M, Barber FA. Postoperative pain control after shoulder arthroscopy [J]. Orthopedics, 2008, 31(11): 1130.
6
彭良.温针灸治疗老年性膝骨关节炎的临床观察[J].辽宁中医杂志,2009,36(10): 1773-1774.
7
方剑乔,包黎恩,莫晓明.经皮神经电刺激镇痛的临床观察及与电针的比较[J].针灸临床杂志,1999, 15(1): 40-41.
8
钟坚娥,林慧敏,冯雯雯.穴位贴敷疗法联合肩三针温针灸治疗肩周炎的临床疗效分析[J].中医临床研究,2016,8(21): 95-96,102.
9
黄小珊,罗和平.温针灸肩三针联合寒痹散穴位贴敷治疗风寒湿痹型肩周炎效果观察[J].山东医药,2018,58(34): 74-76.
10
高军龙,李玉兰.浅谈经皮穴位电刺激在围麻醉期的多种作用[J].中国针灸,2015, 35(3): 269-273.
11
李小梅.经皮穴位电刺激的临床镇痛进展[J].中国际疼痛医学杂志,2014, 20(11): 826-829.
12
王婧,田素领,吴娇娟,等.合谷穴穴性剖析[J].中国针灸,2017,37(5): 565-566.
[1] 许亚龙, 巩栋, 陈晓涛. 超前镇痛在全膝关节置换术中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 517-523.
[2] 宋玟焱, 杜美君, 陈佳丽, 石冰, 黄汉尧. 唇腭裂手术围手术期疼痛管理的研究进展及基于生物材料治疗新方法的展望[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 397-405.
[3] 易颖煜, 朱亚琴. 口颌面疼痛的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 300-306.
[4] 杜伟, 廖土明, 李雄才, 关刚强, 何燊, 吴佳桥, 朱和荣. 2%利多卡因凝胶和润滑剂凝胶在女性尿流动力学检查中应用的随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 613-617.
[5] 闫亚飞, 范学圣, 张舰, 吴勇. 经腹腹膜前疝修补术治疗复发腹股沟疝的临床效果[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 552-556.
[6] 李康虎, 王继伟, 王光远. 腹腔镜下腹股沟疝修补术后并发症及防治进展[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 369-375.
[7] 许文娟, 伍翠云, 许燕, 倪超. 标准化人文关怀服务在腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 456-460.
[8] 徐淑英, 张汪, 王玲, 江照凤. 个体化护理对腹股沟疝无张力修补术后疼痛及舒适度的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 461-465.
[9] 任甜甜, 张玉慧, 祁玲霞, 朱梅冬, 胡佳. 多学科疼痛管理对胸腔镜肺叶切除术后胸痛及应激反应的影响分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 630-633.
[10] 王守森, 傅世龙, 鲜亮, 林珑. 深入理解控制性减压技术对创伤性颅脑损伤术中脑膨出的预防机制与效果[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 257-262.
[11] 吴孝琦, 罗飞, 史凡凡, 方青. 移动健康在慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛患者自我管理中的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 251-256.
[12] 汪鹏飞, 程莹莹, 赵海康. 骨髓间充质干细胞改善神经病理性疼痛的机制探讨[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 230-234.
[13] 武继敏, 袁春雨, 王鲁佳, 陈伟霞, 李晓东, 马丽虹. 重复经颅磁刺激治疗脑卒中后中枢性疼痛的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(03): 182-186.
[14] 韦巧玲, 黄妍, 赵昌, 宋庆峰, 陈祖毅, 黄莹, 蒙嫦, 黄靖. 肝癌微波消融术后中重度疼痛风险预测列线图模型构建及验证[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 715-721.
[15] 蔡晓雯, 李慧景, 丘婕, 杨翼帆, 吴素贤, 林玉彤, 何秋娜. 肝癌患者肝动脉化疗栓塞术后疼痛风险预测模型的构建及验证[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 722-728.
阅读次数
全文


摘要