切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华针灸电子杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (01) : 5 -9. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3240.2021.01.002

所属专题: 文献

论著

温针疗法对肩关节镜术后镇痛消肿的疗效观察
楚晓丰1,(), 范小艺1, 姜丽1, 梁宁1, 刘春玲1   
  1. 1. 264200 山东省威海卫人民医院骨科
  • 收稿日期:2012-02-27 出版日期:2021-02-15
  • 通信作者: 楚晓丰
  • 基金资助:
    山东省中医药管理局科研项目(2019-0785)

Clinical study on analgesic and detumescent effect of warm acupuncture on patients after shoulder arthroscopy

Xiaofeng Chu1,(), Xiaoyi Fan1, Li Jiang1, Ning Liang1, Chunling Liu1   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopaedics, Weihaiwei People′s Hospital, Weihai 264200, China
  • Received:2012-02-27 Published:2021-02-15
  • Corresponding author: Xiaofeng Chu
引用本文:

楚晓丰, 范小艺, 姜丽, 梁宁, 刘春玲. 温针疗法对肩关节镜术后镇痛消肿的疗效观察[J]. 中华针灸电子杂志, 2021, 10(01): 5-9.

Xiaofeng Chu, Xiaoyi Fan, Li Jiang, Ning Liang, Chunling Liu. Clinical study on analgesic and detumescent effect of warm acupuncture on patients after shoulder arthroscopy[J]. Chinese Journal of Acupuncture and Moxibustion(Electronic Edition), 2021, 10(01): 5-9.

目的

探讨温针治疗对肩关节镜术后患者镇痛消肿临床疗效。

方法

将2019年6月至2020年3月于山东省威海卫人民医院骨科行肩关节镜手术的80例患者,按照随机数字表法随机分为对照组和试验组,每组40例。对照组采用常规肩关节镜治疗,试验组采用常规肩关节镜治疗,术后予以温针治疗。2组术前与术后不同时间的疼痛、肿胀情况比较采用单因素重复测量资料的方差分析,不同时段两组间比较采用LSD-t法检验。

结果

(1)视觉模拟评分(VAS)比较。对照组和试验组治疗后各时段VAS评分均较2组术前降低(F=2.58、8.42,P均<0.05);2组治疗后各时段比较:试验组术后后各时段VAS评分与对照组比较,差异有统计学意义(F=1.715,P<0.05),进一步两两比较,试验组术后24 h、48 h、72 h的VAS评分较对照组降低,且差异有统计学意义(t=1.726、1.897、2.526,P均<0.05)。(2)2组患者肘关节外上髁上15 cm处周径变化比较。对照组和试验组术后各时段肘关节外上髁上15 cm周径均较2组术前增大(F=13.25、198.30,P均<0.05),随着术后时间增加周径逐渐变小;2组治疗后各时段比较:试验组术后各时段肘关节外上髁上15 cm处周径与对照组比较差异有统计学意义(F=1.824,P<0.05),进一步两两比较,试验组术后24 h、48 h、72 h肘关节外上髁上15 cm处周径较对照组减小,且差异有统计学意义(t=1.598、1.635、1.825,P均<0.05)。(3)2组患者腋窝处周径变化比较。2组术后各时段腋窝处周径均较2组术前明显增大(F=2.25、212.30,P均<0.05);2组治疗后各时段比较:试验组术后各时段腋窝处周径与对照组比较差异有统计学意义(F=1.617,P<0.05),进一步两两比较,试验组术后24 h、48 h、72 h腋窝处周径较对照组减小,且差异均有统计学意义(t=1.617、1.826、1.659,P均<0.05)。

结论

温针疗法可以有效减轻肩关节镜术后的肿胀、疼痛,值得临床推广。

Objective

To investigate the analgesic and detumescent effect of warm acupuncture on patients after shoulder arthroscopy.

Methods

A total of 80 patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopy in the Department of Orthopedics, Weihaiwei People′s Hospital of Shandong Province from June 2019 to March 2020 were randomly divided into a control group and an experimental group according to the random number table method, with 40 patients in each group. The control group was treated with conventional shoulder arthroscopy, while the experimental group was treated with conventional shoulder arthroscopy and postoperative warm acupuncture. The comparison of pain and swelling between the two groups at different times before and after operation was performed by one way ANOVA with single factor repeated measurement data, and the comparison between the two groups at different times was performed by LSD-t method.

Results

(1)Comparison of VAS scores. VAS scores in the control group and the experimental group in each period after treatment were all lower than those in the two groups before treatment (F=2.58, 8.42, all P<0.05). Comparison of each period after treatment between the two groups: the VAS scores of the experimental group and the control group in each period after surgery showed statistically significant differences (F=1.715, P<0.05). Further pin-two comparison showed that the VAS scores of the experimental group at 24 h, 48 h and 72 h after surgery were lower than those of the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (t=1.726, 1.897 and 2.526, all P<0.05). (2)Comparison of circumference at 15 cm of the external epicondyle of elbow joint between 2 groups. The circumference of 15 cm on the external epicondyle of the elbow in the control group and the experimental group in all operation periods increased compared with that before operation in the 2 groups (F=13.25, 198.30, all P<0.05), and the circumference gradually decreased with the increase of postoperative time. And two groups after treatment were compared: the difference between two groups in each period was statistically significant (F=1.824, P<0.05), further comparison showed thatthe circumference of the experimental group after 24 h, 48 h, 72 h group was reduced compared with that of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (t=1.598, 1.635, 1.825, all P<0.05). (3)Comparison of axillary circumference between 2 groups. The axillary circumference in each period after operation in both groups was significantly larger than that before operation in both groups (F=2.25, 212.30, all P<0.05). And two groups after treatment were compared: the difference in the circumference of the experimental group in each period after treatment was statistically significant compared with the control group(F=1.617, P<0.05), further comparison showed that the circumference of the experimental group after 24 h, 48 h, 72 h was reduced, and the difference was statistically significant (t=1.617, 1.826, 1.659, all P<0.05).

Conclusion

Warm needle therapy can effectively reduce the swelling and pain after shoulder arthroscopy, which is worthy of clinical promotion.

表1 2组患者手术前后肩关节VAS评分比较(分,±s)
表2 2组患者手术前后肘关节外上髁上15 cm周径比较(cm,±s)
表3 2组患者手术前后腋窝处周径比较(cm,±s)
1
边文超,张磊,李进选,等.肩关节镜围手术期镇痛新进展[J].中国骨伤,2015,28(1): 85-89.
2
[美]阿扎(Azar). 坎贝尔骨科手术学[M].唐佩福,王岩,卢世璧. 北京:北京大学医学出版社,2018.
3
夏永宁,侯海琴,赵毅,等.急性肩锁关节脱位诊断与治疗的现状[J].中国老年学杂志,2018,38(24): 6121-6123.
4
李良军,丑克,何志勇,等.肩关节镜下治疗巨大肩袖撕裂的疗效观察[J].中国内镜杂志,2015, 21(10): 1077-1081.
5
Ruiz-Suarez M, Barber FA. Postoperative pain control after shoulder arthroscopy [J]. Orthopedics, 2008, 31(11): 1130.
6
彭良.温针灸治疗老年性膝骨关节炎的临床观察[J].辽宁中医杂志,2009,36(10): 1773-1774.
7
方剑乔,包黎恩,莫晓明.经皮神经电刺激镇痛的临床观察及与电针的比较[J].针灸临床杂志,1999, 15(1): 40-41.
8
钟坚娥,林慧敏,冯雯雯.穴位贴敷疗法联合肩三针温针灸治疗肩周炎的临床疗效分析[J].中医临床研究,2016,8(21): 95-96,102.
9
黄小珊,罗和平.温针灸肩三针联合寒痹散穴位贴敷治疗风寒湿痹型肩周炎效果观察[J].山东医药,2018,58(34): 74-76.
10
高军龙,李玉兰.浅谈经皮穴位电刺激在围麻醉期的多种作用[J].中国针灸,2015, 35(3): 269-273.
11
李小梅.经皮穴位电刺激的临床镇痛进展[J].中国际疼痛医学杂志,2014, 20(11): 826-829.
12
王婧,田素领,吴娇娟,等.合谷穴穴性剖析[J].中国针灸,2017,37(5): 565-566.
[1] 刘嘉嘉, 王承华, 陈绪娇, 刘瑗玲, 王善钰, 屈海花, 张莉. 经阴道子宫-输卵管实时三维超声造影中患者疼痛发生情况及其影响因素分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 959-965.
[2] 董红华, 郭艮春, 江磊, 吴雪飞, 马飞翔, 李海凤. 骨科康复一体化模式在踝关节骨折快速康复中的应用[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 802-807.
[3] 利洪艺, 杨浪, 温国洪, 关鸿, 茹江英, 王湘江. 全膝股骨假体矢状面位置与术后膝前痛及功能的关系[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 479-484.
[4] 吴晶晶, 胡倩, 李华凤. 围产期焦虑/抑郁与分娩疼痛相关性的研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(02): 156-161.
[5] 钟轼, 李斌飞, 温君琳, 古晨, 廖小卒. 右美托咪定缓解神经病理性疼痛作用机制的研究进展[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 237-240.
[6] 吴畏, 吴永哲, 李宗倍, 崔宏力, 李华志, 许臣. 轻质大网孔补片腹腔镜下疝修补术治疗老年腹股沟疝的疗效及炎症因子的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 70-73.
[7] 王琦, 陈新, 闵捷, 方露, 刘志奇, 孙伟, 于德新. 膀胱软镜镜检术中改良"Bag Squeeze"法的应用与疼痛焦虑影响因素分析[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 237-241.
[8] 王可, 范彬, 李多富, 刘奎. 两种疝囊残端处理方法在经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术中的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 692-696.
[9] 夏松, 姚嗣会, 汪勇刚. 经腹腹膜前与疝环充填式疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的对照研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 702-705.
[10] 王敏, 蒋家斌, 李茂新. 预警宣教联合个性化疼痛管理对腹股沟疝手术患者的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 764-767.
[11] 周晓艳, 王志钢, 周冬喜. 超声引导下腹横肌平面阻滞在腹腔镜腹股沟疝手术中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 579-583.
[12] 曲峰, 孙成宜, 王克涛, 王智, 李鹏飞, 张明珠. 关节镜下后踝三入路切除术治疗疼痛性跟距骨桥[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(02): 106-110.
[13] 付强, 秦丽媛, 李全波. 神经病理性疼痛患者血清miR-15a水平及意义分析[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 293-298.
[14] 黄涌, 邓宏平, 黄丽, 沈秋桐, 曹汉忠. 耳穴压籽联合经皮穴位电刺激对老年膝关节置换术后急性疼痛的作用[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 285-290.
[15] 李明, 姚文平, 黄谦, 祁红艳, 侍昊. 桂枝加葛根汤结合温针灸对颈性眩晕患者IL-6、hs-CRP、ET-1及NO的影响[J]. 中华针灸电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 95-100.
阅读次数
全文


摘要