切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华针灸电子杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (03) : 89 -92. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3240.2020.03.001

所属专题: 文献

论著

基于解剖列车理论康复治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床研究
程亭秀1,(), 刘树强1, 肖丙龙1, 曹景文1, 吴殿霖1   
  1. 1. 157299 牡丹江东宁市人民医院康复医学科
  • 收稿日期:2020-02-02 出版日期:2020-08-15
  • 通信作者: 程亭秀
  • 基金资助:
    黑龙江省卫生计生委科研课题(2017-581)

Clinical study on rehabilitation treatment of lumbar disc herniation based on Anatomy Trains Theory

Tingxiu Cheng1,(), Shuqiang Liu1, Binglong Xiao1, Jingwen Cao1, Dianlin Wu1   

  1. 1. Department of Rehabilitation, Dongning People′s Hospital, Mudanjiang 157299, China
  • Received:2020-02-02 Published:2020-08-15
  • Corresponding author: Tingxiu Cheng
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Cheng Tingxiu, Email:
引用本文:

程亭秀, 刘树强, 肖丙龙, 曹景文, 吴殿霖. 基于解剖列车理论康复治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床研究[J]. 中华针灸电子杂志, 2020, 09(03): 89-92.

Tingxiu Cheng, Shuqiang Liu, Binglong Xiao, Jingwen Cao, Dianlin Wu. Clinical study on rehabilitation treatment of lumbar disc herniation based on Anatomy Trains Theory[J]. Chinese Journal of Acupuncture and Moxibustion(Electronic Edition), 2020, 09(03): 89-92.

目的

观察基于解剖列车理论下康复治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效。

方法

选取2018年10月至2019年8月东宁市人民医院康复医学科门诊收治的腰椎间盘突出症患者60例。采用随机数字表法将患者分为治疗组和对照组,每组各30例。治疗组采用解剖列车理论指导下康复治疗,对照组采用传统中医推拿治疗,2组均治疗4周。治疗后采用χ2检验比较2组临床疗效,采用两独立样本t检验比较2组治疗前后视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分。

结果

2组患者治疗2周后、4周后及治疗3个月后随访,治疗组与对照组VAS评分比较,差异均有统计学意义(t=6.105 0、7.248 6、7.248 6,P均<0.05)。治疗组治愈22例,显效7例,有效1例,无效0例,治愈率为73.33%(22/30),总有效率为100.00%(30/30);对照组治愈12例,显效10例,有效4例,无效4例,治愈率为40.00%(12/30),总有效率为86.66%(25/32)。2组患者临床治愈率和总有效率比较,差异均有统计学意义(χ2=6.79、2.41,P均<0.05)。

结论

基于解剖列车理论康复治疗腰椎间盘突出症疗效显著,值得临床推广应用。

Objective

To observe the curative effect of rehabilitation treatment of lumbar disc herniation based on the Anatomy Trains Theory.

Methods

Sixty patients with lumbar disc herniation admitted to the outpatient department of the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine of Dongning People′s Hospital from October 2018 to August 2019 were selected. With the random number table method, 60 patients with lumbar disc herniation were divided into the treatment group and the control group, 30 cases in each group. The treatment group received rehabilitation therapy under the guidance of the Anatomy Trains Theory, while the control group received traditional Chinese massage therapy. Both groups were treated for 4 weeks. After treatment, the χ2 test was used to compare the clinical efficacy of the two groups. Two independent sample t-tests were used to compare the VAS scores of the two groups before and after treatment.

Results

Thet wo groups of patients were followed up 2 weeks and 4 weeks after treatment and 3 months after the end of treatment. The VAS scores of the treatment group and the control group were significantly different (t=6.105 0, 7.248 6, 7.248 6, all P<0.05). In the treatment group, 22 cases were cured, 7 cases were markedly effective, 1 case was effective, and 0 cases were ineffective. The cure rate was 73.33% (22/30) and the total effective rate was 100.00% (30/30); the control group was cured in 12 cases and markedly effective in 10 cases , 4 cases were effective, 4 cases were invalid, the cure rate was 40.00% (12/30), and the total effective rate was 86.66% (25/32). The clinical cure rate and total effective rate of the two groups were statistically significant (χ2= 6.79, 2.41, all P<0.05).

Conclusion

Based on the Anatomy Trains Theory, the rehabilitation treatment of lumbar disc herniation has significant curative effect and is worthy of clinical promotion.

表1 2组腰椎间盘突出症患者治疗前后VAS评分比较(±s,分)
1
Balague F, Mannion AF, Pellise F,et al.Nonspecific low back pain[J].the lancet,2012,379(9814):482-491.
2
中华医学会疼痛学分会脊柱源性疼痛学组.腰椎间盘突出症诊疗中国疼痛专家共识[J].中国疼痛医学杂志,2020,26(1):2-6.
3
关玲,周维金,瓮长水主译.Thomas W.Myers著.解剖列车—徒手与动作治疗的肌筋膜经线[M].北京:军事医学科学出版社,2015.
4
李丽,王传英,李庆波,等.悬吊运动技术联合蜡疗治疗慢性下腰痛的疗效观察[J].中华物理医学与康复杂志,2010,32(10):775-776.
5
邓安波.下腰痛病因探讨[J].中国冶金工业医学杂志,2013,30(6):740.
6
袁俊山.针刺结合推拿手法治疗腰间盘突出症240例疗效观察[J].内蒙古中医药,2011,30(10):34-35.
7
张国生,李萍,周祥杰.几种常见慢性疼痛性疾病与职业关联度调查分析[J].黑龙江医药科学,2008,31(1):58.
8
周谋望,岳寿伟,何成奇,等. "腰椎间盘突出症的康复治疗"中国专家共识[J].中国康复医学杂志,2017,32(2):129-135.
9
杨振.推拿手法治疗腰间盘突出症研究概况[J].广西中医药,2019,42(1):59-61.
10
王和鸣,黄桂成主编.中医骨伤科学[M].北京:中国中医药出版社,2015.
11
(新西兰)罗宾·麦肯基,克雷格·库贝,著.麦肯基疗法[M].北京:金城出版社,2011.
12
李俊,于国华,帅浪.核心稳定训练结合麦肯基疗法对腰椎间盘突出症的疗效观察[J].实用临床医学,2017,18(11):7-11.
13
李硕,刘丽爽,周金娜,等.核心稳定训练联合体外冲击波治疗腰椎间盘突出症疗效观察[J].康复学报,2019,29(6):16-20.
14
张国辉,牟鑫,郭清娟,等.核心稳定训练联合手法治疗腰椎间盘突出症30例[J].上海中医药杂志,2019,53(7):48-51.
15
林安,梁超.毫针联合腹针治疗腰椎间盘突出症临床研究[J].针灸临床杂志,2019,35(9):16-20.
16
戴秀霞.腰部推拿联合腹部推拿治疗腰椎间盘突出症急性期的疗效分析[J].中医临床研究,2016(29):65-67.
[1] 熊倩, 罗凤. 乳腺癌患者术后康复现状与对策的研究进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 372-374.
[2] 董红华, 郭艮春, 江磊, 吴雪飞, 马飞翔, 李海凤. 骨科康复一体化模式在踝关节骨折快速康复中的应用[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 802-807.
[3] 豆艺璇, 黄怀, 钱绮雯, 邢然然, 林丽, 白建芳. 低强度吸气肌训练对机械通气患者肺康复的影响[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(05): 370-375.
[4] 张蓉, 秦洪真, 杨晓冬, 刘爽, 刘明锋, 曹秀堂. 分化型甲状腺癌术后康复锻炼的临床应用研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 439-442.
[5] 张翼飞, 郭强, 赖华健, 钟文文, 叶雷, 马波, 瞿虎, 尧冰, 邱剑光, 王德娟. 加速康复外科在儿童尿道下裂围术期的应用效果分析[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 367-371.
[6] 李雪, 刘文婷, 窦丽婷, 刘叶红. 联合护理在腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补中的应用效果分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 750-754.
[7] 郑华蓉, 刘俊, 郑艳, 陈玉莲, 廖子敏. 加速康复外科理念下的集束化护理模式在腹股沟疝修补术中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 643-646.
[8] 吕瑶, 张婵, 陈建华, 张鸣青. 压力控制容量保证通气模式在腹腔镜肝细胞癌切除术中的应用[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 528-533.
[9] 周杰, 陈倩茵, 张静琳. 视觉重塑在视觉损伤中的原理及应用进展[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 221-225.
[10] 丁晨梦, 胡雪慧, 闫沛, 程乔. 髋部骨折术后患者居家康复体验质性研究的Meta整合[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 365-372.
[11] 中华医学会骨科分会关节学组. 中国髋、膝关节置换日间手术围手术期管理专家共识[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 321-332.
[12] 李美娜, 宋艳丽, 杨姗姗, 李聚彩, 罗慧利, 吕杰. 三联预康复策略在退行性脊柱侧弯患者围术期的应用效果[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 356-364.
[13] 李子彤, 李林斌, 马涛, 高共鸣, 农鲁明. 经椎间孔椎体间融合术(TLIF)后对侧早期神经根性疼痛的危险因素分析[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(05): 269-274.
[14] 赵军, 李超杰, 李佳. 雷贝拉唑联合康复新液对治疗幽门螺杆菌阳性的十二指肠溃疡的疗效[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 254-258.
[15] 李岩松, 李涛, 张元鸣飞, 李志鹏, 周谋望. 头戴式虚拟现实设备辅助全膝关节置换术后康复的初步研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 676-681.
阅读次数
全文


摘要