切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华针灸电子杂志 ›› 2016, Vol. 05 ›› Issue (04) : 148 -151. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3240.2016.04.005

论著

浮针辅助治疗中度癌性疼痛的疗效观察
钟华1,2,()   
  1. 1.250014 济南,山东省千佛山医院中医科
    2.250014 济南,山东中医药大学第一临床医学院肿瘤科
  • 收稿日期:2016-05-30 出版日期:2016-11-15
  • 通信作者: 钟华
  • 基金资助:
    山东省自然科学基金(ZR2015HL108)山东省中医药科技发展计划(2015-282)

Clinical effective observation of floating-needle assisted therapy for moderate cancer pain of patients

Hua Zhong1,2,()   

  1. 1.Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Shandong Qianfoshan Hospital,Jinan 250014,China
    2.Oncology Department,The First Clinical Medical College of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Jinan 250014,China
  • Received:2016-05-30 Published:2016-11-15
  • Corresponding author: Hua Zhong
引用本文:

钟华. 浮针辅助治疗中度癌性疼痛的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华针灸电子杂志, 2016, 05(04): 148-151.

Hua Zhong. Clinical effective observation of floating-needle assisted therapy for moderate cancer pain of patients[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Acupuncture and Moxibustion(Electronic Edition), 2016, 05(04): 148-151.

目的

观察浮针疗法辅助治疗中晚期肿瘤患者中度癌痛的临床疗效。

方法

选择2012年1月至2014年1月山东省千佛山医院中医科及肿瘤放化疗科住院的中晚期不同肿瘤癌痛患者。将60例中度癌痛患者,按照随机数字表法分为联合治疗组及对照组各30例。联合治疗组在上述治疗基础上给予阿是穴周围浮针治疗1~2针,1次/d,24 h更换1次,连续观察14 d。对照组以硫酸吗啡缓释片30 mg为起始剂量口服,每12 h服药1次,根据疼痛程度调整并增加剂量,连续观察14 d。采用SPSS17.0统计分析软件进行统计学分析,两组治疗前后硫酸吗啡缓释片平均使用量,疼痛次数和治疗前、后QOL各项评分均为计量资料,采用两独立样本t检验;两组疗效比较,采用Wilcoxon秩和检验。以P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

治疗第14天,联合治疗组当天硫酸吗啡缓释片使用量为(50.67±9.07)mg,对照组为(57.67±8.98)mg,两组比较差异有统计学意义(t=3.004,P<0.05);联合治疗组癌痛发作数为(0.77±0.63)次,而对照组为(1.10±0.64)次,两组比较差异有统计学意义(t=2.012,P<0.05);联合治疗组生活质量各项评分较对照组明显增加,差异均有统计学意义(t值分别为1.967、1.996、2.079、3.897、2.362、2.553,P均<0.05);联合治疗组30例患者中完全缓解患者15例,部分缓解患者12例,轻度缓解患者2例,无效1例,总有效率96.7%(29/30);对照组30例患者中完全缓解者11例,部分缓解者9例,轻度缓解者5例,无效5例,总有效率83.3%(25/30),两组疗效比较差异有统计学意义(Z=1.724,P<0.01)。

结论

浮针疗法可有效减少硫酸吗啡缓释片使用的剂量及减少肿瘤患者癌痛爆发次数,改善中晚期肿瘤患者的生活质量。

Objective

To observe the clinical curative effect of floating-needle supplementary therapy for moderate cancer pain in patients with middle and terminal stage of cancer.

Methods

Sixty patients of middle and terminal stage of cancer with moderate cancer pain were randomized into a floatingneedle therapy group and Western medicine group,30 cases in each one,who were selected from the department of traditional Chinese medicine and oncology Shandong Qianfoshan hospital ranging from January 2012 to January 2014.Western medicine group was given 30 mg/every 12 hrs with an initial dosage of 60 mg/day.The dosage was adjusted according to the relief of pain.The floating-needle therapy group was given floating-needle therapy,on the basis of above treatment.One or two needles were inserted at the sites 5 cm away from the pain point,which were manipulated and scattered subcutaneously.The treatment was given one time/per day.After 14-day treatment,the analgesic efficacy was observed by comparing the average dosage of MS-Contin,numbers of the outbreak of pain,quality of life and total effective rate between two groups.

Results

After 14-day-treatment,the dosage of MS-Contin was(50.67±9.07)mg in combined treatment group,while the dosage of MS-Contin was(57.67±8.98)mg in Western medicine group,there was a significant difference between the two groups(t=3.004,P<0.05).The outbreak of pain was(0.77±0.63)in the combined treatment group,while it was(1.10±0.64)in the Western medicine group,there was a significant difference between the two groups(t=2.012,P<0.05).The score of life quality was obviously improved in the combined treatment group compared with that of Western medicine group(t=1.967,1.996,2.079,3.897,2.362,2.553,all P<0.05).The total effective rate was 96.7%(29/30)in combined treatment group,and which was 83.3%(25/30)in the Western medicine group(Z=1.724,P<0.01).

Conclusion

The floating-needle therapy can effectively reduce the dosage of MS-Contin,reduce the number of the breakout of the pain,and improve the quality of life in patients with the middle and terminal stage of cancer.

表1 两组治疗前后硫酸吗啡缓释片平均使用量和疼痛次数比较
表2 两组治疗前、后生活质量各项评分比较(分,±s)
1
符仲华.浮针疗法速治软组织伤痛[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2003.
2
孙燕.内科肿瘤学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2001.
3
黄雄,张纬建,蔡传书.奥施康定治疗中重度癌痛的临床观察[J].海峡药学,2010,22(6):169-170.
4
陈彬,方镇斌,蔡丹,等.加味金铃子散配合西药治疗晚期重度癌痛临床研究[J].新中医,2015,47(7):117-118.
5
杨静.西黄胶囊联合西药治疗晚期癌症疼痛临床研究[J].亚太传统医药,2015,11(4):113-115.
[1] 汪洪斌, 张红霞, 何文, 杜丽娟, 程令刚, 张雨康, 张萌. 低级别阑尾黏液性肿瘤与阑尾黏液腺癌超声及超声造影特征分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 865-871.
[2] 燕速, 霍博文. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治性切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 13-13.
[3] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[4] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[5] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[6] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[7] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
[8] 冯旺, 马振中, 汤林花. CT扫描三维重建在肝内胆管细胞癌腹腔镜肝切除术中的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 104-107.
[9] 陈浩, 王萌. 胃印戒细胞癌的临床病理特征及治疗选择的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 108-111.
[10] 郭兵, 王万里, 何凯, 黄汉生. 腹腔镜下肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 143-143.
[11] 魏丽霞, 张安澜, 周宝勇, 李明. 腹腔镜下Ⅲb型肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 145-145.
[12] 王湛, 李文坤, 杨奕, 徐芳, 周敏思, 苏珈仪, 王亚丹, 吴静. 炎症指标在早发性结直肠肿瘤中的应用[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 802-810.
[13] 刘琦, 王守凯, 王帅, 苏雨晴, 马壮, 陈海军, 司丕蕾. 乳腺癌肿瘤内微生物组的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 841-845.
[14] 广东省护士协会介入护士分会, 广东省医师协会介入医师分会. 原发性肝癌低血糖患者护理规范管理专家共识[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 709-714.
[15] 韦巧玲, 黄妍, 赵昌, 宋庆峰, 陈祖毅, 黄莹, 蒙嫦, 黄靖. 肝癌微波消融术后中重度疼痛风险预测列线图模型构建及验证[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 715-721.
阅读次数
全文


摘要