Study on intervention treatment with auricular acupressure in people at high risk for diabetes

doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3240.2015.03.004

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of intervention treatment with auricular acupressure in elderly patients at high risk for diabetes.

Methods

A total of 103 patients at high risk of diabetes were selected from six communities of Weihai Wendeng city. Patients were randomly divided into two groups,observation group ( n=52 ) and control group ( n=51 ). There were 27 male patients and 25 female patients in observation group, with mean age ( 55.2±6.7 ) years. The mean age of was ( 53.8±5.9 ) years, and there were 25 male patients and 26 female patients in control group. The observation group was given the intensive health education combined with auricular acupressure (pancreas, gallbladder, between screen and Ashi, sticking vaccaria seed). Patients of observation group were given the intensive health education and were asked to press auricular points 30 minutes before meals and before going to bed for 1～2 min. Patients were given the intensive health education in control group. Data of body mass index ( BMI ), waist circumference, total cholesterol ( TC ),triglyceride ( TG ), low density lipoprotein cholesterol ( LDL-C ), fasting blood glucose ( FBG ), postprandial 2 h glucose ( 2 hPG ) and glycated hemoglobin ( HbAlc ) were compared between two groups after one year treatment. SPSS13.0 statistical software was used for data analysis. The independent samples t test was used to compare the clinical efficacy in two groups. The paired t test was used for data before and after treatment.P＜0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

There were significant differences in BMI, waist circumference, TC, TG, LDL-C, FBG, 2 hPG and HbAlc between two groups after intervention ( t=4.38, 4.98,19.18, 10.46, 6.74, 10.20, 5.18 and 22.84, P＜0.05, respectively ).

Conclusion

The intervention treatment with auricular acupressure can significantly control BMI, blood glucose and lipid levels, so as to prevent and delay the occurrence of diabetes mellitus in elderly people.

Key words: Acupressure, Research, Intensive intervention

Rongjuan Jia, Huiyun Li, Xiangying Yu, Zhihong Yu, Lihong Gao. Study on intervention treatment with auricular acupressure in people at high risk for diabetes[J]. Chinese Journal of Acupuncture and Moxibustion(Electronic Edition), 2015, 04(03): 116-120.

/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://zhzjdzzz.cma-cmc.com.cn/EN/10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3240.2015.03.004

https://zhzjdzzz.cma-cmc.com.cn/EN/Y2015/V04/I03/116

Figures/Tables 3

References 12

［1］	姚丽,尹玲,李璞,等.银川市社区老年糖尿病患者饮食控制知识、信念及行为现状的调查[J].中华老年学杂志,2011,31(2):665.
［2］	吕召霞,贾荣娟,李惠云,等.多学科团队强化干预对糖尿病高危人群代谢指标的影响[J].国际医药卫生导报,2013,19(10):1409-1413.
［3］	刘形,李英华,李莉,等.中国6省糖尿病患者糖尿病防治知识现状及影响因素分析[J],中国健康教育,2014,30(1):11-15.
［4］	中华医学会糖尿病学分会.中国2型糖尿病防治指南(2011年版)[J].中国医学前沿杂志:电子版,2011,3(6):54-94.
［5］	解鸿翔,张河,张莉,等.天津市“社区糖尿病高危人群预警与健康管理体系建设”项目卫生经济学评价[J].中华糖尿病杂志,2014,6(2):97-100.
［6］	王炜,吴殷夏,唐唯岚.耳穴贴压加中药治疗糖调节受损的临床研究[J].上海针灸杂志,2010,29(2):94-96.
［7］	叶任高.内科学[M].6版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2004:787-808.
［8］	王莉,尚有全,苏伟.2型糖尿病危险因素分析[J].中国医师杂志,2014,16(5):681-682.
［9］	马艳,刘雅,欧阳凌云,等.成都地区中老年人群糖尿病前期患病率及危险因素调查[J].四川医学,2011,32(10):1508-1509.
［10］	林勇,贾荣娟,姜庥每.糖尿病高危人群健康教育方法的改进效果[J].国际医药卫生导报,2014,20(15):2267-2270.
［11］	张力彪,张存志,王素敏.穴位埋线对糖尿病前期人群糖代谢的影响[J].针灸临床杂志,2010,26(11):1-4.
［12］	宋丹,赵丽娟,王丽,等.耳部整体按摩在糖尿病二级预防中的作用[J].光明中医,2012,27(4):755-756.

组别	例数	性别		年龄	学历		职业
组别	例数	男	女	年龄	≥高中	≤初中	工人	机关事业	其他
观察组	52	27	25	55.2±6.7	36	16	17	27	8
对照组	51	25	26	53.8±5.9	35	16	15	30	6
t/χ²值		0.09	0.09	1.12	0.00	0.00	0.13	0.50	0.29
P值		0.77	0.77	0.26	0.95	0.95	0.72	0.49	0.59

组别	例数	性别		年龄	学历		职业
组别	例数	男	女	年龄	≥高中	≤初中	工人	机关事业	其他
观察组	52	27	25	55.2±6.7	36	16	17	27	8
对照组	51	25	26	53.8±5.9	35	16	15	30	6
t/χ²值		0.09	0.09	1.12	0.00	0.00	0.13	0.50	0.29
P值		0.77	0.77	0.26	0.95	0.95	0.72	0.49	0.59

组别	例数	时间	FBG（mmol/L）	2 hPG（mmol/L）	HbAlc（%）
观察组	50	干预前	6.4±0.45	8.7±1.34	5.9±0.36
		干预后1年	5.4±0.38^a	6.8±1.01^a	4.5±0.30^a
对照组	49	干预前	6.3±0.41	8.5±1.21	6.0±0.39
		干预后1年	6.2±0.40	7.9±1.10	5.9±0.31
t值			10.20	5.18	22.84
P值			0.00	0.00	0.00

组别	例数	时间	FBG（mmol/L）	2 hPG（mmol/L）	HbAlc（%）
观察组	50	干预前	6.4±0.45	8.7±1.34	5.9±0.36
		干预后1年	5.4±0.38^a	6.8±1.01^a	4.5±0.30^a
对照组	49	干预前	6.3±0.41	8.5±1.21	6.0±0.39
		干预后1年	6.2±0.40	7.9±1.10	5.9±0.31
t值			10.20	5.18	22.84
P值			0.00	0.00	0.00

组别	例数	时间	BMI（kg/m²）	腰围（cm）	TC（mmol/L）	TG（mmol/L）	LDL-C（mmol/L）
观察组	50	干预前	26.4±3.35	90.4±10.5	5.7±0.34	2.4±0.23	3.4±0.32
		干预1年后	23.5±2.28^a	76.4±9.8^a	4.8±0.31^a	1.5±0.18^a	2.5±0.28^a
对照组	49	干预前	26.3±3.29	89.6±10.3	8.5±1.21	2.3±0.22	3.3±0.30
		干预1年后	25.6±2.49	86.4±10.2	7.9±1.10	1.9±0.20	2.9±0.31
t值			4.38	4.98	19.18	10.46	6.74
P值			0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00

Please choose a citation manager

Content to export